Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Monday, December 28, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Monday, December 14, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Whoever suggests that Enlightenment is a linear process is dead wrong. Finding the way through life is a spiral experience, and that is only if I am being an optimist. Some days I am convinced that life moves in a circular pattern; that, like the Wheel of Fortune, each of us is doomed to walk the same path of ups and downs over and over with no reprieve, changing pattern, or purpose. Today I am convinced the pattern varies each time, and though I may be experiencing a similar adventure, I am not actually in the same place I was before.
My pattern involves a struggle between the desire for control over that which I feel, and the fact that I only feel when I refuse the reins of control. Any artist or athlete can tell you what I mean. Technique only becomes artistry when it is used as a tool of the artist. When mastery of technique is the single goal of the artist, that which is created may work, but will rarely communicate anything important. Keeping the balance between technique (control) and expression (disciplined feeling) is an ongoing exercise for me.
My pattern also involves friction between loneliness and differentiation. It seems I am never completely free of desire to "be liked." I seek the safety and solace of fitting in. I often try to reduce tensions in my relationships by refusing to state a preference or apologizing when some expression of mine creates discomfort for another. Yet that refusal to differentiate myself from other stunts my potentials and contributes to dissatisfaction with my day to day existence. It also leads to shallow relationships-the exact opposite result from the one desired.
Another significant pattern that I revisit with each iteration of the spiral staircase is the inner conflict between ambition and mindfulness. I desire greatness, but I repudiate fame, fortune, power, martyrdom, self-denial, and poverty. I believe that being as and what I am is all that is asked, yet I feel like I have failed with each instance of another's greater achievement. I "should" work harder, focus better, commit more deeply-in short BE MORE.
Each of these tensions re-erupts from time to time in my life. Each time I believe I have vanquished one unworthiness, one obstacle on my path to Enlightened living, I find one of the other old soldiers standing before me. I am left with the choice between taking up my arms or going home. (One time I tried surrendering completely. No one would accept my terms.) So, either I am walking the same path-an ox strapped to the mill wheel, believing the cud I chew is the purpose of my being-or I am walking around the same center, but each step I take is actually taking me someplace new.
I really don't want to believe I am too obstinate to learn. I will take the second interpretation.
Comfortable in my illusions,
Cobalt Dreams.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Monday, November 2, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Monday, August 24, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Monday, July 6, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Monday, June 22, 2009
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Friday, May 15, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Dear Pneuma,
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Monday, January 19, 2009
The word "know" is an interesting word. There was a time in history when "to know" someone meant to have had sex with him or her, "to know in a carnal sense." This meaning includes a sense of something more than a rational exercise. It seems to imply that to truly know something (or someone), you have to see, taste, hear, and feel it.
So, today I say, "I know why it is cold outside." I say, "I know why water boils." I say, "I know what you mean."
To enrichen the word "know," do I mean "I not only understand the scientific principles behind boiling water, I also encompass the feel, flavor, sight, and sound of boiling water?" Is my use of the word "know" meant to convey a scientifically proven set of principles when I tell someone "I know what you mean?"
It seems, I often use the word "know" when I am trying to turn a belief into a statement of fact: "I know the sun will come up tomorrow." "I know it won't do any good to talk to my sister-in-law." "I know there is God."
In the future, I hope to use "know" with a richer sense of meaning, and to avoid replacing the ideas in which I believe with unproved and unprovable "I know" statements.
Because belief is stronger than knowledge on any given day of the week, and knowing something will require more time and depth of engagement than I usually give.
Happy Monday,
Cobalt Dreams